quote:If people do not take anything I post seriously anymore, I would like to point out that this was not my idea; it was presented in Amon Hen by one Mallow Smith.
Oh... I'm just pulling your leg a bit. No harm, no foul.
As Eluchil said, it is quite a stretch. Plus "For Ronald" doesn't mean anything. My theory("Far Noldor") actually would make more sense.
If we went around scrambling combinations of Tolkien names... you could basically come up with anything and everything. Who knows... one might even find the Entwives.
*wanders off to scramble "Brown Lands", "Teleporno" and "Treebeard"*
From: Sverige! | Registered: Oct 2002
| IP: Logged |
It would mean that Tom Bombadil is 'for Ronald' - that Tom Bombadil is Tolkien, that Tolkien inserted himself into his creation.
quote:If we went around scrambling combinations of Tolkien names... you could basically come up with anything and everything.
I agree, but in this case we are dealing with two names for the same character, and the character happens to be the most mysterious in Tolkien's works.
From: Nowadays: The Lord of the Rings Fanatics Forum | Registered: Jan 2002
| IP: Logged |
quote:It would mean that Tom Bombadil is 'for Ronald' - that Tom Bombadil is Tolkien, that Tolkien inserted himself into his creation.
It would also mean that he refers to himself in third person... a la Knuckle Dragger, and uses one of his three names that I've never heard him go by.
No, no... I can't buy this. At any rate, it doesn't explain who Tom Bombadil is within the confines of the mythology.
From: Sverige! | Registered: Oct 2002
| IP: Logged |
quote:It would also mean that he [Tolkien] refers to himself in third person...
But is that not more natural to the reader than referring to himself as 'me'?
quote:... [Tolkien] uses one of his three names that I've never heard him go by.
Biography:
quote:This ['Ronald'] was the name by which Arthur and Mabel came to address their son, the name that would be used by his relatives and later by his wife. Yet he sometimes said that he did not feel it to be his real name; indeed people seemed to feel faintly uncomfortable when choosing how to address him.
quote:At any rate, it doesn't explain who Tom Bombadil is within the confines of the mythology.
But it may be that Tolkien did not have a place within the mythology in mind for him. We should not just look for such an explanation for Tom, but also exterior explanations.
[ 07-13-2006, 08:18 AM: Message edited by: Herendil ]
From: Nowadays: The Lord of the Rings Fanatics Forum | Registered: Jan 2002
| IP: Logged |